[Semiconductor] HBM Packaging in 2025: From MR-MUF and TC-NCF to Hybrid Bonding as the Next Standard
![]() |
HBM Packaging |
[Posting: 2025.08.19]
In 2025, the competition in HBM packaging centers on the evolution of stacking methods. SK hynix, with its MR-MUF process, has stably mass-produced 12-Hi stacks, securing advantages in thermal paths and yield, and is preparing for 16-Hi expansion. Samsung Electronics emphasizes mechanical compatibility by implementing 12-Hi at the same height as 8-Hi through precise TC-NCF stacking, while differentiating with its I-Cube/H-Cube platforms for logic integration. Micron challenges the HBM3E market with a focus on power efficiency, strengthening its position through adoption in NVIDIA’s H200. For next-generation HBM4, featuring a 2,048-bit interface and 2 TB/s bandwidth, hybrid bonding is emerging as an essential technology. While MR-MUF and TC-NCF coexist in the current generation, hybrid bonding is expected to become the standard going forward.
Complete Analysis of HBM Packaging Stacking Methods: MR-MUF vs. TC-NCF vs. Hybrid Bonding and Competitor Pros & Cons
Executive Summary
High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) uses TSV (Through-Silicon Via) to vertically stack DRAM dies into a “cube,” which is then integrated with GPU/ASICs via 2.5D interposers or advanced packaging. The stacking method is a critical factor that determines yield, throughput, thermal performance, and scalability.
-
MR-MUF (Mass Reflow + Molded Underfill): Strong in productivity and thermal path management, ideal for 12-Hi/16-Hi stacking.
-
TC-NCF (Thermal Compression + Non-Conductive Film): Strong in height control and precision alignment, widely used by Samsung.
-
Hybrid Bonding (Cu-to-Cu, bump-less): Next-gen solution for HBM4, enabling higher density, better electrical performance, and reduced stack thickness.
-
Integration platforms differ: TSMC CoWoS (S/L/R) vs. Samsung I-Cube/H-Cube.
1) Fundamentals of HBM Stacking
-
TSV formation → holes etched into DRAM wafers and filled with copper.
-
Microbump bonding → die-to-die electrical connections.
-
Underfill application → mechanical reinforcement and stress relief.
-
Stack capping and thinning → final height and planarization.
The bonding + underfill approach is what differentiates MR-MUF, TC-NCF, and Hybrid Bonding.
2) Technical Comparison of Stacking Methods
TC-NCF (Thermal Compression + Non-Conductive Film)
-
Process: Sequential stacking, with an insulating film placed between dies, compressed with heat and pressure.
-
Advantages:
-
Excellent height control and coplanarity, enabling Samsung’s 12-Hi HBM3E with the same height as 8-Hi modules.
-
Reliable gap filling with reduced void formation.
-
-
Disadvantages:
-
Sequential bonding = lower throughput.
-
Limited number of thermal dummy bumps → challenges for heat dissipation in high-stack, high-power designs.
-
MR-MUF (Mass Reflow + Molded Underfill)
-
Process: Dies are stacked and then encapsulated with molded underfill in one batch reflow process.
-
Advantages:
-
Batch process = higher throughput and productivity.
-
Allows more thermal dummy bumps, improving thermal paths for 12-Hi and 16-Hi stacks.
-
Stronger mechanical support with conductive fillers for thermal conduction.
-
-
Disadvantages:
-
Mold stress and warpage management is more complex.
-
Requires fine-tuned material engineering.
-
Hybrid Bonding (Cu-to-Cu, bump-less)
-
Process: Direct Cu-Cu bonding at die surfaces, without microbumps or underfill.
-
Advantages:
-
Pitch scaling: much tighter I/O density.
-
Stack height reduction (~15%), lowering thermal resistance.
-
Improved electrical performance (low RC, lower power).
-
-
Relevance to HBM4:
-
Required to support 2,048-bit bus width and ~2 TB/s per stack.
-
Industry adoption expected from 2025–2026 onward.
-
3) Integration Platforms: Logic + HBM
-
TSMC CoWoS
-
CoWoS-S: Large silicon interposer (~2,700 mm²).
-
CoWoS-L/R: Organic/RDL-based interposers for even larger packages with stress mitigation.
-
Used in NVIDIA’s latest AI GPUs (Blackwell).
-
-
Samsung I-Cube / H-Cube
-
I-CubeS/E: Silicon vs. embedded bridge solutions.
-
H-Cube: Hybrid substrate mixing fine-pitch + HDI, designed for up to 8–12 HBM integration.
-
4) Competitor Packaging Strategies
SK hynix
-
Core Technology: Advanced MR-MUF.
-
Strengths:
-
Leading in throughput, yield, and thermal path design.
-
Pioneered 12-Hi and preparing for 16-Hi.
-
-
Weaknesses:
-
Needs smooth transition to Hybrid Bonding for HBM4+.
-
Samsung Electronics
-
Core Technology: TC-NCF with precise height control.
-
Strengths:
-
Achieved 12-Hi HBM3E at same height as 8-Hi.
-
Strong platform integration via I-Cube/H-Cube.
-
-
Weaknesses:
-
Thermal path limitations under extreme stacking.
-
Actively evaluating MR-MUF and Hybrid Bonding to remain competitive.
-
Micron Technology
-
Core Technology: TC-NCF with focus on power efficiency (claimed ~30% better than peers).
-
Strengths:
-
Strong efficiency appeal; adopted in NVIDIA H200 accelerators.
-
-
Weaknesses:
-
Needs to enhance high-stack reliability and transition roadmap toward Hybrid Bonding.
-
5) Comparative Table
Factor | TC-NCF | MR-MUF | Hybrid Bonding |
---|---|---|---|
Process | Sequential | Batch reflow | Direct Cu-Cu |
Throughput | Low | High | Medium |
Thermal Path | Limited dummy bumps | More dummy bumps | Lowest thermal resistance |
Stack Height | Excellent control | Challenging | Reduced (~15%) |
Scalability (12-Hi/16-Hi) | Moderate | Strong | Best |
Maturity | High | High (tuning needed) | Emerging |
6) Key Insights
-
Current Generation (HBM3E) → MR-MUF leads in yield, throughput, and thermal performance.
-
Samsung’s TC-NCF → valuable for precision and height constraints.
-
Micron → positions itself around efficiency rather than stacking height.
-
Next Generation (HBM4) → Hybrid Bonding becomes mandatory for 2,048-bit I/O and thermal management.
-
Integration Platform Choice (CoWoS vs. I-Cube/H-Cube) is equally critical for system reliability and scalability.
Summary
HBM packaging technologies—TC-NCF, MR-MUF, and Hybrid Bonding—are shaping the next generation of memory integration.
-
MR-MUF dominates current 12-Hi/16-Hi HBM3E with superior throughput, yield, and thermal performance.
-
TC-NCF remains valuable for height control and precision stacking, as proven by Samsung’s 12-Hi designs.
-
Hybrid Bonding (Cu-to-Cu) is the future for HBM4, enabling 2,048-bit bandwidth and ~2 TB/s per stack.
-
At the system level, TSMC CoWoS-S/L/R and Samsung I-Cube/H-Cube provide different approaches to large-scale HBM + logic integration.